Ito's lemma - quick and dirty

By Gabriel Dunin-Borkowski – Last Updated:

This page manually replicates our LaTeX source in HTML, preserving color, math, and structure. Equations are rendered with MathJax.


Introduction

We start by defining an Itô process Xt with drift μt and diffusion σt. We also recall that Wt is a Wiener (Brownian) process, with \( dW_t \sim O\left(\sqrt{\Delta t}\right) \).

Let $$dX_t = \mu_t\,dt + \sigma_t\,dW_t,$$ where \(W_t\) is a standard Brownian motion.

We consider a function \(f = f_t(X_t)\). We want to determine how \(f_t(X_t)\) evolves over an infinitesimal time step, i.e., we want \(df_t\) - How does \(f_t\) grow? What are its dynamics? That is - what is its total differential?

Taylor Expansion

We use Taylor's theorem in multiple dimensions to expand the increment (difference) Δf. We keep terms up to second order in Δx, since higher-order terms become negligible in the limit. We'll show how it is that they become negligible and which ones do become negligible and which ones don't.

$$\Delta f = f_{t+\Delta t}\bigl(x+\Delta x\bigr) \;-\; f_t(x).$$ $$\Delta f = f\bigl(t+\Delta t,\,x+\Delta x\bigr) \;-\; f(t,x).$$

Hence, by Taylor's theorem: $$\Delta f \;=\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\,\Delta t \;+\; \frac{1}{2}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial t^2}\,(\Delta t)^2 \;+\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,\Delta x \;+\; \frac{1}{2}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}\,(\Delta x)^2 \;+\;\cdots.$$

Because \((\Delta t)^2 \ll \Delta t\) when \(\Delta t \to 0\), we can discard terms like \(\mathcal{O}((\Delta t)^2)\). That is, higher exponents dominate when the exponent base goes to infinity, but smaller exponents dominate when the exponent base goes to zero. Thus, in limit-land, we have:

$$\Delta f \;\approx\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\,\Delta t \;+\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,\Delta x \;+\; \frac{1}{2}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}\,(\Delta x)^2.$$

Recall \(dX_t = \mu_t\,dt + \sigma_t\,dW_t\). In the infinitesimal limit, $$\Delta X_t \;\to\; \sigma_t\,dW_t \quad\text{as}\quad \Delta t \to 0.$$ Squaring this, $$(\Delta X_t)^2 \;\to\; \sigma_t^2\, (dW_t)^2.$$ And in Itô calculus, \((dW_t)^2 = dt\). To motivate this, recall that, \( dW_t \sim O\left(\sqrt{\Delta t}\right) \), and therefore \( \left(dW_t\right)^2 \sim O\left(\Delta t\right) \). So, if we take the time difference to approach zero:

$$(\Delta X_t)^2 \;\to\; \sigma_t^2\,dt.$$

Itô's Lemma

Putting it all together, in differential form:

$$df_t(X_t) \;=\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\,dt \;+\; \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dX_t \;+\; \frac{1}{2}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}\,\sigma_t^2\,dt.$$

This expression is the renowned Itô's lemma. The second-order term in x does not vanish because (dWt)2 is of order dt, yielding a non-zero contribution. The distribution of test statistics have non-degenerate asymptotic behavior.

Final form:
\( \displaystyle df_t(X_t) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\,dt + \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,\bigl(\mu_t\,dt + \sigma_t\,dW_t\bigr) + \tfrac{1}{2}\,\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}\,\sigma_t^2\,dt. \)

Due to the non-vanishing quadratic variation of \(\{W_t\}\), the second derivative term remains in the final differential of \(f\). This is the essence of Itô's lemma.


Because quadratic variation (of Brownian motion) never disappears, the second-order term in the Taylor expansion remains.